![]() ![]() ![]() The tight string pattern helped me with accuracy and pinpointing targets. The racquet was whippy and fast but still had enough plow through to allow me to hit deep and attack. I felt more connected to my shots with this racquet, and the ball felt more solid at contact. That said, I did enjoy this VS Tour much more than the Pure Aero VS Tour. ![]() I've been whipping up through the ball instead of extending out, which is a problem for my game, so I didn't love that it has thrown my game off a bit. Second, something about the VS Tour racquets have messed with my swing a bit. She offered, "First, I have to say that the paint job of this racquet confused me a bit because it played much differently than the Pure Strike 16x19 (Project One7) that we tested. Michelle took a bit of time to adjust to the racquet as well, but she preferred it over another VS Tour racquet that she recently playtested. I did like the response of the racquet on my slice backhand, and the controlled response worked well on approach shots and short put-aways." My spin production was OK, but nothing approaching what I get from my Pure Drive Plus. When strung at anything close to or above mid tension, the Pure Strike VS Tour lacked comfort and was very underpowered for its weight. I found the Pure Strike VS Tour to play a little better at the bottom end of the tension range and with a very soft poly or a multi/poly hybrid to improve comfort. On the other hand, the recently discontinued Pure Control Tour offered superb control, more power, and most importantly, tons of feel for touch shots. The response of the Pure Strike VS Tour left me feeling disconnected from my shots. Just like the Pure Storm Tour GT, this Pure Strike VS Tour provides a classic low powered player's racquet response, but both also lack feel. I wish they'd cosmetically updated the Pure Control Tour instead. He shared, "With the Pure Strike VS Tour, Babolat has resurrected the feel of the old Pure Storm Tour GT. Overall, I enjoyed the performance of this racquet from the baseline, but I think it would benefit from some added weight in the head to help with put away power and easier depth of shots."Ĭhris thought this Pure Strike VS Tour felt more similar to prior iterations than its direct predecessor. I was able to hit my slice backhands with lots of backspin to keep the ball skidding low, although I would have liked more weight in the head of this racquet to help generate easier depth. As I did with the Pure Control Tour, I was finding good precision, and I felt like I could place the ball where I wanted within the court. Once I adjusted to the swingweight I was getting loads of spin due to the easy maneuverability, and I thought the 16x20 string pattern allowed for good bite on the ball. When I started hitting with it my timing was off on my groundstrokes because the swingweight is about 10-15 points lower than my usual racquet, and I was noticing a lack of plow through. "The weight and balance of this racquet felt similar to the previous iteration, the Pure Control Tour, but with the Pure Strike VS Tour I found a crisper and more modern feel. "I liked the fast, whippy feel as soon as I picked this racquet up and began swinging away from the baseline," Troy explained. However, almost everyone noted a lack of feel. It took a bit of time for our playtesters to adjust to the Pure Strike VS Tour when hitting from the baseline, but once they did the control and maneuverability it offered turned out to be our favored attributes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |